State of orissa vs debendra nath padhi
Webstate of orissa vs. debendra nath padhi. laws(sc)-2004-11-67 supreme court of india. decided on november 29,2004 state of orissa appellant. versus ... state of orissa vs. dedendra nath padhi [referred to] cited judgements :-rajesh jain vs. state of rajasthan [laws(raj)-2009-1-116] [referred to] WebAbout Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright ...
State of orissa vs debendra nath padhi
Did you know?
WebJan 18, 2024 · In ["State of Orissa Vs. Debendra Nath Padhi", (2005) 1 SCC 568, the Supreme Court after comparing Section 207 in the old Code of 1898 and Section 227 which was introduced in the new Cr. P. C observed as under: “9. Further, the scheme of the Code when examined in the light of the provisions of the old Code of 1898, makes the position more … WebNov 29, 2004 · State of Orissa v/s Debendra Nath Padhi Criminal Appeal No.497 of 2001 (with S.L.P. (Crl.) No.1912/2003 and Crl.A.No.46 of 2004) Decided On, 29 November 2004 …
WebISSUE: Can the trial court at the time of framing of charge consider material filed by the accused? RULE: Section 227 was incorporated in the Code with a view to save the … WebJul 9, 2024 · State Of Orissa vs Debendra Nath Padhi on 29 November, 2004 Rukmini Narvekar vs Vijay Sataredkar & Ors on 3 October, 2008 R.S. Mishra vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 1 February, 2011 Sajjan Kumar vs C.B.I on 20 September, 2010 Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 January, 1947 Kamlapati Trivedi vs State Of West Bengal on 13 …
Webin State of Orissa Vs. Debendra Nath Padhi, 2005 (1)ACR71 (SC), AIR2005SC359, 2005 ( (1))ALT (Cri)198, 2005 (1)ALT (Cri)1198 holding that the law is that at the time of framing charge or taking cognizance the accused has no right to produce any material. Satish WebApr 5, 2013 · Delhi Administration and Another [ (1996) 9 SCC 766] was overuled in State of Orissa Vs. Debendra Nath Padhi, 2005 (1)ACR71 (SC), AIR2005SC359, 2005 ( (1))ALT (Cri)198, 2005 (1)ALT (Cri)1198 holding that the law is that at the time of framing charge or taking cognizance the accused has no right to produce any material.
WebJan 6, 2024 · Supreme Court of India State Of Orissa vs Debendra Nath Padhi on 29 November, 2004 Author: Y.K.Sabharwal Bench: Y.K. Sabharwal, D.M. Dharmadhikari, Tarun Chatterjee CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 497 of 2001 PETITIONER: State of Orissa RESPONDENT: Debendra Nath Padhi DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/11/2004 BENCH: Y.K. Sabharwal, D.M. …
WebDec 1, 2024 · [ Debendra Nath Bhattacharya & Ors vs State Of West Bengal & Anr ] In the said judgment it is held as under: 8. In the case before us, the... Fatimaben Wd/O Abdul Rasak Abdul Gani v. Faruq Samsuddin 3 Court: Gujarat High Court Date: Sep … goforth gaming shoppeWebthe decision of the Apex Court in State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi, 2005 (1) SCC 568 (Para 25) and in the case of Nitya Dharmananda v. Gopal Sheelum Reddy, 2024 (2) SCC 93 (Para 8). go forth for god hymn lyricsWebSep 17, 2024 · A fortiori, it would seem incongruous to import the tests evolved by the Supreme Court in State of Orissa vs. Debendra Nath Padhi (2003) 2 SCC 711 under Section 227/239 Cr.P.C at the stage prior to framing of charges, to the discharge contemplated under Section 329 (2) Cr.P.C., which operates at the stage of trial i.e., post the framing of … go forth for god umh 670WebJun 13, 2024 · The Court considered the opinion expressed in State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (2005) 1 SCC 568. To frame charges, the Trial Court has to consider whether … go forth for god youtubeWebState Of Orissa vs Debendra Nath Padhi on 29 November, 2004 Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment … goforth for governorWeb(From Orissa High Court) Y.K. Sabharwal, D.M. Dharmadhikari and Tarun Chatterjee, JJ. State of Orissa —Appellant versus Debendra Nath Padhi —Respondent Criminal Appeal … go forth from this worldWebThe decision of the Full Bench of the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of STATE OF ORISSA VS. DEBENDRA NATH PADHI reported in (2005)1 SCC 568 is relevant for our purpose. Paragraph Nos.8, 15, 16, 18 and 25 of the said decision read as under: ” 8. What is to the meaning of the expression ‘the record of the case’ as used in Section 227 of the Code. goforth gaming