WebThompson v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1930] 1 KB 41 Plaintiff could not read - so was not aware of what is written on the ticket - incorporation through notice applies It has been suggested that the decision may have been different if the company had been aware of the plaintiff's inability to read, as it would then have been clear that simply handing over … WebCurtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing [1951] 1 KB 805; L’Estrange v F. Graucob [1934] 2 KB 394; McCutcheon v David MacBrayne [1964] 1 WLR 165; Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] …
Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway
http://e-lawresources.co.uk/cases/Table-of-cases-R-Z.php WebThompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41 is an English contract law case, concerning the exclusion of liability. It was described by Lord Denning … gage block grades mitutoyo
Thompson v L.M.& S.Railway [1930] 1 KB 41 Case - Studocu
Thompson was unable to read and she travelled on a train with her daughter and niece. On the back of her ticket it was printed that the tickets were issued subject to the terms outlined in the company’s time tables. The time tables contained a clause purporting to exclude liability for any injuries to passengers, … See more The company contended they had taken reasonable steps to bring the exclusion clause to the attention of their customers, as the contract terms were clearly … See more Thompson was unsuccessful in her claim. It was irrelevant that she was unable to read. The company had taken sufficient steps to bring the terms to customers’ … See more WebOlley v Marlborough Court Ltd [1949] 1 KB 532 (ICLR) Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams (BAILII: [1956] EWCA Civ 5)[1957] 1 WLR 370 ; Pao On v Law Yiu Long (BAILII: [1979] UKPC 2) [1980] AC 614 ; Paradine v Jane (BAILII: [1647] EWHC KB J5) (1647) Aleyn 26, 82 ER 897; Parker v South Eastern Railway Company (1877) 2 CPD 416 WebEC be given in order that the EC be valid (Olley v Malborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532; Thompson v LMS Railway [1930] 1 KB 41; Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd [1971] 2 QB 163). For a number of years it was argued than an EC could not exclude a fundamental breach of contract (see, for example, Karsales (Harrow) Ltd v Wallis [1956] 1 WLR 936). black and white noisiel